The Business...

...Pentagon(*) or Salon Green Room.

The War of 2016
Cherry-Picked Dominoes
Meaner O'Reilly
Pope on Palestine
O'Reilly on Colbert

(*) to pun on Round Table
but (WTR) what the Rush?

G'Ribble: [Clown Car A or B?]

(FP!)

Re:Nexus

Bad Intel.
Greek to sum?
Stochastic(~)Gnostics?

Knot to Re:Cycle ![?]
Clinton Bashir?
The Table ?

T. P.

Not Exactly ... Patron Saint of Process.*

i.e. PS Trianglution Process

* 5-18-15
It used to be called the big tent. I relate this to a big table in the age of Share 'n Angle.*

"Now the president is staking his reputation on a trade deal that is increasingly likely to be seen as a joint Obama/GOP initiative. If he succeeds, his legacy may suffer a mortal blow, and his party is likely to pay a terrible political price in years – and elections – to come."

A. It could have the effect of growing the Warren Wing.
B. There are outside of the trade-deal elements of legislation that have been obstructed and need support. Infrastructure, wages, Affordable Care Act, etc.

The problem with his legacy won't hold a candle to the problem with that of congress's.

* earned media translated to churned media
Camelot 3.0?

For Careful Processing:

Iran Progress?
Israelis' Onion?
GOP Treason?

The Middle East label has been underused in this blog.  Foreign Policy a more frequent label.  Not sure if the Obama Doctrine has superseded it.  The piece by Juan Cole may seem in jest, but may be the actual reason Israel is so belligerent.  Not to mention the GOP. 

4-7-15 link @ mention added

Daryl Cagle ?

not too mention ? Irony Table?
???   Daryl  Cagle !!!

4-8-15
Foreign and Domestic?

There was the 3 AM call...

Now there is the Wednesday Morning Quarterbacking or Afternoon Running Back Fake*.
Not to men~shun Re-labels.
All In?

The nexus is the legacy of progress**.  Now that may seem too muddled to be clear, but it takes a table.  It takes three branches of government and lede~or~ship.  The legislation in Indiana, the TPP, and the Iran negotiations, spin on the interpretation of rules and who writes them.  The spinning will continue.   

* technical difficulties^ with MSNBC links(hopefully temporary)
Indiana object lesson for America
Subject Lesson?  Lesson

^ Indiana GOP changes language in religious freedom law
** links dropped

Fed~Upism?

Knit One?
(a. FP4 (2-20-15) FP$, b.Footnotes Page December 2014(Page One), c. Schiller, Schelling, Shell Lacking and Schopenhauer*?, d. Shilling / Schiller, e. Try Angle Nation )
Pear Type-Oh? Re:nacre
(a. Knit one , b. or ?, c. Going through Hegel or..., d. Crooked Timber, e. 'n?, f. Gatekeeper on a High Horse?, g. Remember Pearl Harbor! )

Ctlr F: type-O.(...) [!]
Irony within Onion ? [!]
Misplaced support ? (...)
(a. QCON and Flip-Flop: AN IRAN OUT, b. Under the Table?, c.The day of the Elephant?, d. Leveling the World Stage?, e. For Careful Processing:, f. There was the 3 AM call..., g. And Bailout..., h. GOLEFT TV  ...?)

(un-Mbedded consequences? 4Lab-L's)

4-14-15
(fp?) mobius :A. THE TRUTH APPARENT: A MOBIUS LAP , B. , C. Too Random... , D. Re:Figure , E. Rough Riders , F. The Undisclosed Bunker Branch of the Government. G. Borrow and Twist- a surfing metaphor? , H. Stuart Smally Anyone? , I. RUNNING WITH RHETORIC .

The day of the Elephant?

Democracy is... [?]
The table ... ?

The point to be* illuminated later**.
There are other tusky references in the works. 

[ ? : A. Too Random..., B. What the Beck?, C. hmmm?, D. Saber Rattling]
... "the worst form of government"
De "form of worship"?

*2B: Hegelian Rationality? , Para~graph Three! ?
tusky:  a., b.Original Intent , c., d., e. The %th EleFont

**  my comment @
 

The TPP seems to be similar to the Iran nuclear negotiations in its secrecy.
Now there are leaks or portions of what are on the table being used to argue against what is generally the responsibility of the administration; foreign policy.
Could it be that opposition from the left on this is as off base as opposition from the right on almost everything President Obama has tried?
...

Not that I support anything where the fine print is withheld from the public, couldn't this fit within the general progress that the Administration has achieved despite concerns over words like compromise and moderation? [...]

Tusk! (Divide to conquer?, Work in Progress, CPS, Fight On!, It's Obama's Turn)
O W ?

4-1-15 Update.
 

Obama With Drama

For complete context I will have to read further.

For preemptive context^, is it between the Frost and the Peck?

Recent references?^^
Poetic linkage?

(^) F P
(^^) R. Throwing the Game  / r. Net and Yahoo? , WWW Wisconsin Lesson?





The WhoSure State?

See labels. *











* looking deeper into the quagmire

Re:4th mat ?

[Meanwhile, still digging.  Where did I bury that poetic link?  It may have only been under the italics 2 back.]

AnyHow ... apparently I buried or wove under the nexus** of a brighter side of life.  I must return later to the [...] *** junction?

** bane oar tangent

*** 3-24-15 kantinued post red[!]
Translation: did read.
Path/Road~Frost/Peck to be sorted under Fed oration[!] 
Vulcan/English~Table/Borg \~\
Spock/Nimoy~Idle/Palin Galactic Conference?
Let alone . . . ??[!]

All In

Mo~dem?**
New clear Charlotte?

Post-Obama~ no post-woe man?
Telephone~internet > post all?

Gohmert/Sam Sedar? R'adrenalizing/D'adrenalizing?
Rachel Ma'dow'N!  Camps vs. Draft? ** 
Red cabin/Blue label/Link'on! or lin`COD?
Post-9-11 Kaw'Kuss?
Talk me up!

BTW: Netanyahu pulls an^Obama ?

^ somewhere embedded in his speech(also my posts) is the Frost of the Table.

The Last Word ???? *
[See`DaR for the Trees / The Hillary Kamp / journalists at the gate?]

* thank yaH'way  [Net~n~hu`n?] Richard Wolfe/re:expert! 
Stat'N individual autonomy/sovereignT? The Atlantic SouthEarn Strategy?
Other guest: Canibalize Right Wing Parties? Pivot/Schill!

** may require service/sign-in/ or upgrade

Hegelian Rationality?

HR? Proposed Concept.

For the science religion dichotomy/dilemma. (1-2)
Rationality and irrationality at(3) the same table, and in the same chair.  (shoes/feet/mouth/toss)*
VC: a Virtuous Clog?  P5+1 example.  Cotton pick'n GOP another. 
State of Strauss and the Torah the antithesis? 

Zion is asemantic!

Process proposal?  Kant we... Waltz?

*pundittering additions
(#'d)inserts [ s~r , d/d ]  :: (3) youtube IAM  :: VC vital cognisance? :: State'n Hegel? 
Original aphorism?  (Wit'N Pythagorus)
Lables TBA : T'issue Tan'go?  :: (to be Kantinued)

M-bed F'N:
Strauss :  a. No Teddy , Para~graph Three! , Monday Morning Rally... , Bin(un)Jun'Go , Hegelian Rationality? , Neo-changian? , Relemma'n Leo , Esoteric Relemma[!]
  
RIG^ / SOG subj/obj geometry  : RIG'N progress ~ N = poetics^ / Nietzsche? (tot~ology)
 [ dit , IF,  IW ] ~ lie`bearE? akin to NFR~'Y
Numbers R objective ideal and subjective reality? Cultural conditioning? 25~min.> systemic analysis/
meanfeltic[!] stastical rhetoric?  Meta-Clastic?

Monday Morning Rally...

...Of the File Nature.

See labels[!]*

*there is reading between the lines and there is not scroll-clicking the hyper links.

[3-10-15 ...'N dot org ? !]^

^(FMuse?) [To pun on footnotes~> and Levi-Strauss.]
[ Strauss:  Neo-changian? ::: Levi? ~ / ~ ? ::: ~> to be adjusted ::: on / Bin(un)Jun'Go ::: pun / Files of the ::: M~kind? ]

and tba 3rd (FN) [ ! =Strauss+changian:  Para~graph Three!   Neo-changian? ::: (?) ^/ ^ ::: org: OurFuture.org ::: dot: Center for American Progress ::: 'N hero/competence? :::  ...  keystone / kids table? ::: 3-10-15 : LOL*regime change* ]
 

F~N~8~ing

Footnotes
Nietzsche~/~2(un)Cube
Page Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications.
Re:L8'in to math and geometry. 
What has four faces and eight sides and six edges? 
...
Too Cubed!
Or WeGeMaTron?
C'P/P'C? (from D'sID)
The Other Table! Fact Check ~/~ Interview
C'@ L? ~ Mbeds!
(posted 3-5-15)

Para~graph Three!

Endo-terror~cism?

aka Academics ?

The point?  The esoterics of Strauss maybe the Socratics of Plato, or exoterics of Neitzsche.

Ctrl F (academic:~:academics)
:::  aka [a. FOOTNOTE JUNE 2013 PAGE TWO, b. The Daily Counter Balance , c.(J) In the begining... , (D)BoC, e. Belated Breaking News! , f. THE COUNCIL OF NICE , h. Back-Log August 19th, ("religious ghetto") , i.(G).]
:::   ? [a. Looking Back , b. "if I were dictator" , c. What's good for the goose? Goose the gander! , d. Bane(Or) Change , e. Conservative Foray (4A) ,  f. Blame to go around? , g. Will Safire Replaced by Will I ams., h. Academic Freedom , i. Framing Narratives , j. In the begining... , k. Technical Difficulties , l. The Thorn and the Lyin' , m. Running Joke , n. Let me finish? , o. We are at the table. , p.Forward (Ironically)  ]
(what the fudge?  f-j,p?)
:::   Endo-suffix?

The project  ?   The dance? 
"Esotericism is the practice, widely employed by a variety of thinkers prior to and up through the early Enlightenment, of disguising their real meaning through ellipsis, surface contradiction, dispersal of their real arguments, and the like (indeed—they were misleading casual readers about their true intentions!). The understanding that philosophers like Plato and Aristotle made use of esotericism was central to Strauss’s own project of returning to their thought as an antidote to what he called the “crisis of modernity”, since it pointed to deeper truths hidden behind the evident meaning extracted by superficial readers. It was probably also one of the sources of distrust of Strauss and his followers by other academics, since it implied that initiates into the art of esoteric interpretation had access to meanings unavailable to others." Francis Fukuyama.
Or Ecto~tonics of Aristotle?  Less than Ionic that paranormal came up in  English [?]
P.4,The Prince misquote? P.5 "undermine dogmatism" bingo~? P.6 Nietzsche Recurrance
"That latter struggle was ultimately won, and led to the triumph of the “harmonist” view, now almost universally accepted, that philosophical truth could be made compatible with and indeed supportive of modern politics. Transparency is today the name of that venerable game. Classical philosophers like Plato and Aristotle had a different view; namely, that philosophical skepticism undermined the irrational beliefs necessary to the maintenance of a political community and therefore needed to be kept under wraps. As Melzer points out, there is a large body of contemporary scholarship that actively contends that virtually no one other than a few cranks ever wrote esoterically; he performs a great service by, first, showing that the claim is empirically wrong, and second, that it is itself an historically contingent interpretation." (ibid.)
 
2-25-15 2 ~ B Kantinued ;-) R I P ? [!]
(1) a. Who Let the Dogs Out?, b. The Undisclosed Bunker Branch of the Government., c. ...what about the damage to your Presidency?, (d.) The Curve or Nuance Thing, e. Doxology.
(2)~
(3)  The Be All and End All?

Pen~ta-gone? i.e. P5
"This section of the book is wonderfully erudite and leaves no uncertainty that esotericism was indeed a major art that is now all but lost. Melzer points to four reasons for past uses of esotericism. First, it served as protection from prosecution; he notes its widespread use in totalitarian countries like the former Soviet Union and contemporary China. Second, it served to protect the political community from dangerous truths, such as philosophical skepticism about the city’s gods and traditions; third, it served a pedagogical purpose by forcing readers to engage on a deeper level; and fourth, it was used as a transitional strategy for modern writers seeking to undermine dogmatism." (ibid)
P6?  At this Platonic # I will note Aristotle's place in the Nietzschean struggle.  
Hence Fukuyama is a difficult read of Strauss and Plato who are difficult reads.

P7? "If Philosophy Between the Lines were simply a book..." (where P = par.) I might plow on[!]
@9   "Strauss’s central concern was what he called the 'crisis of modernity', where the project of using philosophical reason for practical purposes was in danger of collapse."
@12 "The recovery of the rationalist project was central to Strauss’s life work—"
Having now fully read it, I will let you decide.

FOOTNOTES PAGE ONE SEPTEMBER 2014

Footnotes Page
in draft*
-

*(b.s.)=blog search
-
Re:labels & other blog spots.

A K A / August missing Footnotes Page
Categorical Empiricists ?**
-

** CAD (To be or not 3d) ?






9-9-14 Original Intent or in tent
(AM IT: [tan gent(~)] Andrea Mitchell ISIS Threat /-/ Witt Gen Stein/Jihadist  Defeating IS IS?
This is not to pun or purge, but to more carefully review later, the word.)


{Stop.} At this point, I will change the heading of this link from #(9-3-14) to "FOOTNOTES PAGE ONE SEPTEMBER 2014"\
-
9-9-14{nexus}
PIT Spot? 1.  T= A. PIT Schtick, B. Clause Wits (3.0)?, C. There is no Savior, :D, E: Three Clauses for ...  [any body love Rice?  Ronan Farrow Daily?]
2. Spoiler Alert? Not yet M-bed ed.
3. C-O.I.? = A.Original Intent?, B. GOP Plan to Hurt Economy, C. The Exit Strategy, D~?.  vOO due: vCR, E. Where everyone needs to read..., F. Table of Contents, G. Health Care Summit, H. Progressive Poll  I. What are the Frackin' Odds..., J.Happy Earth Day!, K.Try Angle,  L. Mess Age Monger,  M. Post-Turkey Day,  N. Nadir, O. Clause Wits, P. Romer Resigns,  Q. Go Purple!,   R. Give an inch..., S. Temporal, T. Back to "The One Thing?". @  {(~)} Future Bubble?


~: OH REALLY FOG / Catch-44
4loreMat[?]: labels 3~ NFRY, meta/slash, P.C.? [/]4Ribble! 
TRP/RBTL: 

Revamp Devenn?

Power Broker Mountain Project
Power Broker Mentor Project***


Psychology
Philosophy
Physics
Politics


Under Construction
Obamanomics


Politics,
Philosophy


Pre-Post-Or-Us: UC
Table Irony ? !


NOW Confidence?
The Cycle? Paul Harvey/Stringonomer
The irony of the caricature.






***[Technical difficulties have put draft at risk of going AWALL.]


While the first...
a revamp or...
Ironically I had...
*(dual asterisks...)
{L} USC (scroll click)...
**background...
Lost in Draft(FP?) Loss confirmed.


REBOOT?

Work in Progress

Pardon my Polish, let alone French.


The Thomas Gil affair.(Winkowski/Kerlikowske)
Noam Comski
Prior two ski(e)s.


(7-14-14) Original Heading "Poll R Express"(7-14-95 m-bed)


7-25-14  Revamp Devenn?
Under the Table?, Re/venn, irony, Tetra Heed Ron , heed / run, USC, legend,
Egg/Road/Sky* , Fight On


loss confirmed The Cycle/NOW
Confidence[?][!]... Ctrl F "if"@Go Jump in the Lakoff[!]

FOOTNOTES PAGE ONE- MAY 2014

5-4-14  In Spiration: Salon-W.R. Klemm / Sch~hhh[!] ... Who started it, I finished it, it still needs sense. (Ctrl F: sense ) Everything Model? A. Para-model, B. Almost makes me want to tweet. , C. Wittgenstein, D. The Politics of the Table. , E. What the Beck? (Witt Gen Stein's Buffet)   Milo Wolfowitz (FP2)

5-5-14:  fath:   ...:   gr :  your : [nexus, cats, herstory, herding] 1.A. NEXUS REVIEW (Re-posted) , B., C., D., E., F., G., H., I.  2. A., B. C. D. Reigning wags and tales ...  M. 3. EH? The History of B.S. 4[$]. A. B., C.Congress is Like Herding Death Panels!, D. What's good for the goose... [?] ow!  

5-7-14: SkyNet published from 5-6-14. Yes link inserted, but italics added. 

5-29-14 this:  Nixon- Plausible Deniability / Bush 43- Plausible Incompetence / Snowden- Plausible What?  Hence the word.  Posting based solely on NBC link.  4Later digging/yet/to read.  ...& further D'Ribble rather than G'Ribble;  Plausible Disciplination asks about his education and training in law or civics or what else he was educated in that might inform his understanding of this exchange with authorities, not that we should expect constitutional scholars not to have varied opinions.  Italics: not a foundation for my ainfount[><].  i.e. bu'dump ump[~]